Many believe that one of Carl Jung’s greatest achievements was his The Red Book (published posthumously in 2009 ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Red_Book_(Jung)). The ony piece of work related to the Red Book that Jung shared publicly was the Seven Sermons to the Dead (Septem Sermones ad Mortuos) which (he printed privately in 1916) which was included in 1962 in his Memories, Dreams, Reflections (https://www.amazon.com/Memories-Dreams-Reflections-C-Jung/dp/0679723951), a year after his death. Seven Sermons appears to represent the final pages of the Red Book and to be a kind of summary of the mythopoetic philosophy of the Red Book.
Many who read the Seven Sermons (and the Red Book) seem to miss the context in which Carl Jung wrote these explorations. As far as I can understand, both pieces of work represent the journey that Jung took into his own mind. For much of his life Jung actively explored his own consciousness/unconsciousness through fantasy. In this fantasy he encountered many guides and the one who grew closest to was called Philemon. He often said that Philemon provided him with wisdom that he could not otherwise have consciously known. Philemon became a powerful influence for Jung’s psychoanalytic work and his unque insights into the human condition. In later life Jung indicated that he no longer needed Philomen, as he could now depend on his own wisdom.
“In his introduction to Liber Novus, Shamdasani explains:
“The text of The Red Book draws on material from The Black Books between 1913 and 1916. Approximately fifty percent of the text of The Red Book derives directly from The Black Books, with very light editing and reworking. The “Black Books” are not personal diaries, but the records of the unique self-experimentation which Jung called his ‘confrontation with the unconscious.’He did not record day to day happenings or outer events, but his active imaginations and depictions of his mental states together with his reflections on these. The material which Jung did not include in The Red Book is of equal interest to the material which he did include.””
And further :
“If one does not place Jung’s confrontation with the unconscious in a proper perspective, or understand the significance of the Red Book, one is in no place to understand fully Jung’s intellectual development from 1913 onwards, and not only that, but his life as well: it was his inner life which dictated his movements in the world. … For Jung’s work on his fantasies in Black Books and the Red Book formed the core of his later work, as he himself contended. The Red Book is at the center of Jung’s life and work. [Understanding Jung] without an accurate account of it would be like writing the life of Dante without the Commedia, or Goethe without Faust.
Like Virgil’s gift to Dante in his allegory, The Divine Comedy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divine_Comedy), Philemon provided Jung with both a journey of discovery and the insight to understand the journey. The journey of course ultimately being about life and reality.
The Seven Sermons to the Dead and The Red Book works of great insight and represent a very powerful inner journey. But what I find so striking, is that people ignore the example that Jung has set for us. Someone else who encouraged such inner exploration was Roberto Assagioli (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roberto_Assagioli) with his Psychosynthesis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychosynthesis). Assagioli developed many methods for internal exploration – which can be used for psyhcotherapy, healing and general exploration of one’s own mind.
I’ve sometimes spoken here and on the TSMs about my own Internal World’s methods (ISS/ICW : https://etandi.wordpress.com/category/internal-worlds-method/) as a means of using the imagination to learn about the nature of one’s consciousness/unconsciousness and to make contact with ETs and those who have died etc. One of the reasons I’ve spoken about this, is because like Jung and Assagioli, I too discovered the power of the imagination to reveal much that is hidden and to move beyond the usual limitations of the ordinary mind. Such methods are at least as powerful as the use of psychdelics, without any of the dangers or potentials for misunderstanding.
The Seven Sermons and The Red Book are powerful and illuminating works but we should not consider them the only creations of their type. Many of you have heard me speak about Alapo – a kind of higher dimensional aspect I’ve been working with (https://etandi.wordpress.com/2016/10/29/alapo-on-consciousness-and-deepening-the-well-of-experience-part-1/ / https://etandi.wordpress.com/2014/11/24/tsm21-a-reading-from-my-book-on-consciousness/). In the last few years I’ve transcibed about 500 pages of dilalogue that has taken place between the two of us. Alapo has also become a sort of boundless guide – with whom I can speak or meet internally. Unlike Jung, I’m not trying to create any kind of personal mythopoetic magnum opus but Like Jung, I seek to understand the self through something more than the conventional view of the self. I sense that in coming decades many other people, who seek understanding about the self and the nature of reality, will attempt similar experiements like my own and those of Jung and Assagioli and is so doing create their own mythopoetic master pieces that draw from the collective wisdom of mankind and the wisdom of the totality of all their lives (or at least one of them).
I can easily imagine a similar work as a result of internal world contact with actual ETs !
Perhaps it will be you who will write the next Sermon ! 😉
The Seven Sermons to the Dead (Septem Sermones ad Mortuos here : http://gnosis.org/library/7Sermons.htm.
Two questions :
What is it that makes you uniquely you ?
What is the you, that takes you to be you ?
Please don’t be afraid ! Let the world hear you !
Thanks to Colin Andrews for sharing this.
A good friend suggests that the body in the first video is not what it appears to be. I reserve my judgment, despite the involvement of forensic experts and apparent authenticity. I can say however that I am very dubious about Gaia.com and their apparent insights regarding disclosure. The Gaia empire has grown way to quick and greedy for my like and my trust.
I dedicate this post to Sandor and Frédéric for your continued support of an ordinary man, on the other side of the world ! Your kindness means worlds to me ! Thank you ! 😉
I’ve mentioned the concept of Conjoined Space a number of times now but haven’t actually had the time to explain what it is. So this post is a basic introduction to the concept.
Conjoined Space is a term that was introduced to me by the ET I publicly refer to as Dude. My discussion with Dude about this subject came about as a result of several conversations that we had about the human idea of parallel universes and parallel lives. A more detailed exploration of this subject happened after January 19th this year, when I experienced a set of events that brought about the darkest period of my life (While my sister was dying of brain tumours. These events overshadowed her death the following month). Dude and I have now had about 20 hours of conversation about this subject and I have found every single conversation to be both exhilarating and deeply confronting. This will be the first time I’ve spoken in any detail about the subject and I am unsure if have the capacity to translate and summarise all that I’ve learned. You may find the subject very confusing and equally confronting. But you may not. Particularly if I can convey the essence of what I have been taught. Be warned, this concept is completely at odds with anything you or I are probably familiar with and contradicts many spiritual traditions. It is also far more complex than anything man has created. (Though of course mathematicians would disagree with this !)
Before I begin let me suggest that after you read this post, you listen this TSM (https://thesomethingmonologues.podbean.com/e/tsm99-an-extraterrestrial-explanation-of-past-lives-future-lives-parallel-lives/), this TSM (http://thesomethingmonologues.podbean.com/e/tsm86-hows-ets-can-time-travel-and-enter-the-afterlife/)
and read this post (https://etandi.wordpress.com/2017/04/20/what-is-space/), for a more detailed understanding of the nature of the self and the nature of space. It’s also important that you understand that while I’ll be talking about what I think of as a concept – a set of ideas; this is reality as Dude and his people the Muajra have come to understand it. Such an understanding of reality is shared by many other Creator Races (with their own individual variations) but may not be something that is completely accessible – in terms of understanding and applications, by other races that are less developed. Many of the human like ETs may understand this concept but have little ability to apply it, as the Creator Races do.
I’m going to keep this as simple as I can.
Conjoined Space…Conjoined Space (CS) is the space that is connected to an original space. In the case of a human being, one life creates other lives – what we ordinarily think of as parallel lives existing in parallel universes. A new life is created by strong emotion and may emerge as a new life having just been conceived in utero, or more often as an older life at the same age. In the case where a new life is created that splits off at the exact same age, everything in that conjoined space is an exact copy, except for a small number of variations. For each copy of a copy, there is greater variation from the original, such that the later copies bear little resemblance to the original life. It might seem logical that there is an infinite number of CS’s and new lives but they are actually finite. Dude tells me that on average a person might experience about 1200 other lives. Now please note, I am not talking about new incarnations (as in reincarnations), I am talking about 1200 other lives splitting off an original life. There may be many incarnations, each with 1200 other lives splitting off. One implication of this is that when an original life dies, some other lives die. Or when other lives dies, some lives still continue. Such that the greater you of that single incarnation, can be both living and dead at the same time.
Let me give introduce a few metaphors to help you understand. Primarily because the way that this actually is, may be impossible for us to comprehend. Dude taught me through metaphors and it’s the only way I can get my head around it. So it seems natural that I should convey things in the same way.
Take a circle which represents the original life which exists in space. Now add a circle slightly off centre, which represents a new life. Now add another circle slightly off centre, which represents another new life and so on. The total space of all the circles is the total of all of the lives added together. Each life shares a CS but only a portion of it – lets call that CSX1, CSX2, CSX3 etc. Alternatively imagine all of the circles in 3D as a vertical spring, where each section of the spring represents a new life. If you look at them from above, now matter how distorted, they are all connected to the section at the bottom. Now a final metaphor. My son plays the game Minecraft, in which he is able to use pixel bricks to build a world. Minecraft has seed worlds that generate random worlds. A player can enter a basic seed world and then create what they want and collect chickens and pigs, be hunted by bad guys and play with fellow players. If the player wants, he can clone a seed world and everything in that world is copied, except for what he has gained since it was created. Imagine then that a seed world is an original life. That life can be cloned at any point after it has begun developing, copying everything. In this instance it also copies what was gained by game play. When the player enters that new world, he enters it as it is but does not experience it’s history. In other words he experiences that world as it is, complete with his perception of it’s history but it’s history did not actually exist – it did not take place for that player. The world simply formed from what was. It was cloned from something previously that experienced it’s own history. So, in this metaphor each new world builds on the conjoined space of the previous world. Follow ?
The idea then that there are parallel universes and parallel lives, is a misnomer. Because that implies that that universe has some overlapping history that goes all the way back to the beginning. Dude is suggesting that it isn’t like that. Reality begins at a point when the new space copied is almost but not quite, similar to the old space but without any direct history.
What I am still confused about is what happens when a new life/conjoined space begins that represents a younger age. I’ll have to leave explaining that aspect till a later date.
Remember Dude’s Fourth Maxim : Time does not exist. There is only space. So it appears that space replicates itself endlessly. Slices of space are all connected, in what we perceive of as time. CS represents a kind of variation in how space ordinarily replicates and as a result, how we perceive time.
So at this point, you might be wondering a number of things. Am I experiencing my original life or a conjoined life ? How do each of my incarnations connect to one another and to each other’s Conjoined Spaces ? Can I consciously create another life or another CS in which I can create something ? Can I be aware of the other lives that are connected to this one ? Among other questions. Dude has told me that it is almost impossible for humans to be aware of these other lives because of the limitations of our perceptions. But he’s been teaching me how to experience some degree of awareness. Total awareness of all our other lives is impossible. I sense that if we were aware of these other lives, it maybe almost impossible to function because of the direct interruption to our almost seamless, linear sense of reality. Remember my comments about how CS may not be completely accessible to lesser developed ETs. It’s an understanding of reality, that I sense represents the highest levels of development and the fact that these highly developed races are able to create all manner of spaces, souls and life forms (see my videos/posts about my encounters with the Teal’hia); may reflect their deep understanding of Conjoined Spaces.
You may remember Dude’s earlier comment :
“If as you believe when you die you create things with your mind, what is this mind that creates ? Does it occupy it’s own space or does it occupy another space – a larger space or a smaller space and where does that space reside ?”
In this comment I think Dude was prodding me to remember that mind is ultimately unconstrained. In view of our conversations about CS, I think he was suggesting that mind is the creator of space (but I suspect his definition of mind is different to ours) and that mind creates endless space in life and in death. For example, the afterlife doesn’t exist as a space that is separate from the space we experience in life, it is just another form or experience of space. The apparent separation is merely an illusion. I believe then that Dude is in agreement with the mythical Buddha – that the mind creates the world. Which of course goes against modern physics and all a priori / causation philosophies, which suggest the world has to exist first for mind to arise.
I believe that CS presents us with a way of understanding all manner of so called metaphysical phenomenon – including : parallel lives, some parallel worlds, Déjà vu (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%C3%A9j%C3%A0_vu), Jamais vu, Presque vu, Déjà entendu, Déjà vécu, some experiences of bi and multilocation and many forms of intuition. And a way of ultimately understanding the cosmos and life itself.
The hardest thing for Dude and many of the ETs is to translate what they know into something that makes sense to us. As I’ve often said before, it’s almost as if Dude has to dumb things down for me (and the other humans he interacts with), so that things are accessible. Sometimes that means he has to shave details off an insight, so that I get the essence of what he’s talking about. It may well be that the entirety of a thing is beyond my comprehension. So he has to understand what I am able to understand and the implications of sharing things with me. I suspect he shared the concept of CS with me for at least three reasons. First, he wanted to give me a way of understanding this unfathomable event that happened on January 19th. Second, he wanted me to share some of what I learn, so that others could begin thinking about reality in a completely different way. In time I will try to write more extensively about the subject and plan on including it in the first ET interview book. Third, he wanted me to heal my tumours and create a long healthy life, whether it’s the same life or another one.
My understanding of CS is as yet very poor. I see a lot of connections between this view of reality, concepts like Holodynamics, Process Philosophy and Process Psychology and the teachings of Jane Robert’s Seth.
Dude is trying to teach me through theory and experience about the nature of reality and how live fully immersed in a greater experience of reality.
Today is the 10th anniversery of my diagnosis with a Renal Carcinoid Tumour. It’s been a long, exhausting and life affirming journey with tumours. But I’m still here. I believe that Dude is trying to help me to stay alive and to see beyond the limitations I have imposed on myself and the limitations that human belief systems have imposed on all of us.
My regular readers will know that I’ve talked a lot about the power structure I call The Architecture (TA) (and have referred to a larger structure I call The Diamond Complex (TDC)). You may recall that I became aware of these structures through my contact with several ETs (including a Teal’hia I refer to as Anamika and a Muajra I refer to as Dude) and my ex wife (who worked inside a covert project that worked with Earth based ETs and did not break her security oath). After picking upon the initial hints from Dude, I initially began paying more attention to who was doing what in the world and later began paying attention to who was monitoring my blogs and electronic communications. Over time I’ve developed a much clearer picture about who’s who in TA and the all pervasiveness of TDC (which I will talk more about in the fullness of time). I’ve often seen lists of so called Powers that Be and it was obvious that these people haven’t got a clue what they’re talking about. The best lists that I’ve seen released are list of defense contractors put out by the more public version of Anonymous (not the individual who pre-dates the movement) and certain lists put out by Wikileaks. I’ve been conscious for a long time that there is a fine line which you can come very close to but if you cross it, there are serious consequences. I’ve come close to that line before and been warned by people who care about me to be careful. So I no longer have any desire to walk that line. But that doesn’t mean I won’t go close.
So rather than tell you what I’ve learned about who’s who in TA/TDC (through a lot of hard work, effort and critical thinking) and put myself or those I care about, at risk, I’m going to teach you how to do it. There are those of you who maybe genuinely interested in this subject (that number is minuscule), who will have the energy and the time to work against the forces of ignorance that shape the lower bodies of corruption power on this planet. But I do not. You will be coming at it from a very different perspective – ie. not having the same contact experiences I’ve had (if any at all), having had a very different life and not having been married to someone who carries a great secret. It is for these people I write about what I have learned. In time there will be people from within TA/TDC, who will seek out sympathetic allies and such people will need to have a real sense of how things work. It is my wish to plant a small seed for a small group of sympathetic allies.
Rather than writing a complex manual outlining all the ins and outs of what you can do, I’ll keep this simple.
So let’s go !
There are many different ways to approach the subject of unearthing information. Perhaps we could begin by thinking about the types of information or targets worth pursuing. These might include military, corporate, government and non government entities. Within these are a range of sectors (I have previously referred to as complexes) including : the peace, construction, military, political, health, utilities, information, media, chemical, food, financial, legal, entertainment, intelligence, technology, education, mining and drug trade sectors, among others. Depending on your interest and your background, it is best to approach the subject of unearthing from one sector or another. In time, one sector will lead to another and you will see a very clear web of interconnections.
From a practical perspective there are many different ways to approach your investigations. The following represent a range of approaches that you can apply in any order you wish :
Look at the main stream media for a week and develop a sense of news media priorities (what seems to matter to those who orchestrate the news).
Learn about the history of the great Industrial Empires of the 17th, 18th and 19th century (Wiki is good because despite inaccuracies, it links many stories and details). Look at how they are connected. Especially how the rise and fall of industrial empires are connected to significant battles and political struggles. Look at what has happened to these great empires today. What have they become ? What companies are the visible in ? And who are these companies connected to ?
Follow the chain of events surrounding specific inventions that changed the world (read my story about Ascanio Sobrero and Nitroglycerine for an indication of how causality links many things together (https://etandi.wordpress.com/2015/12/09/the-man-who-changed-everything/ / https://etandi.wordpress.com/2015/12/20/the-man-who-changed-everything-part-two/).
Create a blog on a controversial subject such as ETs, UFOs, Intelligence, Covert Control etc. Attach simple audience tracking widgets to your blog, such as the one I use – Clustrmaps. Monitor your widget details whenever you feel like it. Every now and then post provocative posts that you think will attract specific attention. Make sure to include appropriate ‘hot tags’ that will get picked up by intelligence software. Keep a list of places known and unknown in different countries. As your list grows, begin investigating potential targets (who are monitoring your blog) starting with Wikpedia. If you look up the site of the target, you can then use Wiki to find out more about Economy. Government and Education, to develop some sense of which entities maybe interested in what you’re sharing. This can be a hit and miss approach but it can also be very accurate. You can also become fixated on the wrong things. This approach requires careful discernment ! With time, you can build a list of potential entities, who are interested in monitoring what ever you’re sharing.
Look up the following subjects on Wiki and build a list of potential tarets :
Government procurements (in USA, UK, Australia, Europe, India, China, Japan etc).
Top 100 government contractors (in USA, UK, Australia, Europe, India, China, Japan etc.).
Counter-insurgency and the Three Pillars of Counterinsurgency
Key government defense and intelligence agencies (in USA, UK, Australia, Europe, India, China, Japan etc.).
Learn about surveillance. Read Wikileaks, read Julian Assange’s books on the subject, read and listen to Barrett Lancaster Brown, listen to Ed Snowden, read Cryptome and the Cryptome Archive, read Glen Greenwald’s No Place to Hide (based on Ed Snowden’s revelations) and subscribe to his website The Intercept. There are many people who have been writing for a long time on this subject.
Read Noam Chomsky’s works and Edward Bernay’s book Propaganda. (see https://etandi.wordpress.com/category/propaganda-machine/).
Read about :
Intelligence collection management
Human Intelligence (HUMINT) & Signals Intelligence (SIGINT)
Defense contractors/security contractors/intelligence outsourcing
The history of the space race
Operation Paperclip (and the equivalent projects that pilfered Japanese scientists)
The history of groups such as the UN, WHO and The Millennium Project
The future of warfare through government and corporate initiated documents such as this one : https://archive.org/details/FutureStrategicIssuesFutureWarfareCirca2025.
Learn about Surveillance Craft and study how intelligence agencies build profiles on people e.g. https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/attach/17/17948_-1.pdf, http://www.intelsecurity.co.uk/courses & http://www.surveillance-tradecraft.co.uk/.
Study the structure of military bodies in the US, Russia, China, the UK and countries in Europe. Learn how they are connected and get a sense of their histories.
Study the operational and strategic plans of key defense and intelligence agencies in the US, Australia and UK before those of any other country.
Investigate your top targets via Wiki and directly through their own websites. Read corporate strategic plans and identify key histories, personnel, projects & investors. The key details here are projects and investors.
Imagine a fictional company. Lets call it Sombre Tell. Sombre Tell is a major government contractor, who provides government contracts to a number of nations, in the areas of intelligence, counter insurgency, and electronic hardware. Begin by following the previous step. Then build a list of subjects that interest you and use their public search engine to find documents related to these subjects.
Imagine a fictional defense and intelligence agency. Lets call it USUKCA. Build a list of subjects that interest you and use their public search engine to find documents related to these subjects. Investigate their key personnel, key projects, key investors and key contractors. Follow the links.
Look at who’s who in government and corporate and NGO bodies. Investigate organisational boards of directors. Look at how certain individuals are connected to different groups with similar or dissimilar interests. Do some research on persons of interest via Linked In, Facebook, Google (https://www.lifewire.com/google-people-search-3482686) and People Seeking search engines. When you use a tool like Linked In, don’t use your real identity and look very carefully at an individuals affiliations and connections.
When looking for documents, remember that most corporate or government agencies use the same document types. So always use common document formats – .pdf, .txt, .doc, .docx, .xlsx, .ppt etc. (https://fileinfo.com/filetypes/common).
Make your work easy by using the biggest source of covert information on the planet – Google. Let the Google Panopticon do the work for you by using all of it’s shortcuts (http://www.webopedia.com/quick_ref/Google_Search_tips.asp) and all of it’s tools (books, scholar, blogs, news, alerts etc.).
Last but most importantly and I mean most importantly, make sure that all your searches are done using Boolean Operators AND, OR, XOR, NOR, NOT (http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/B/Boolean_expression.html / http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/B/Boolean_search.html / http://wiki.lexisnexis.com/schools/index.php?title=Boolean_Searching). My son is an IT geek and I’m often amazed that his generation don’t know how to search the internet properly and really have no idea how to find stuff ! Don’t forget also to always use “talking points” to specify what you’re after and to target domains by country where relevant e.g. Site:.au.
If you really want to know how to unearth TA, it’s going o take a lot of time and effort. And as I hinted at earlier – there are very few people who really have the desire to do this. So next time you hear some dickhead talking about the Trilateral Commission or The Bilderberg’s or some other wank fest controlling the world, take a moment to think about how much time they put into reaching this conclusion !
If you are one of those rare individuals, who are truly interested in TA and human power systems, I encourage you to take your time, read widely and enjoy life fully. There are people within this hierarchy who look forward to finding others who care about equality and justice for all. I guarantee it ! But they wouldn’t want you to take any unnecessary risks. So be careful !
Just as the Ets helped early man to discover the fish hook and the spear tip (the barb in particular) and that changed his destiny and the entire history of the planet, what is required is people who can educate others on how to think about the nature of the self and about the nature of the systems that humans have created.
Most of you will be familiar with this old adage from some unknown source…
Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.
Long may you fish and long may you feed, my fellow human beings. Long may you feed !
OK I lied ! It’s a bullshit title ! I just thought I’d try one of those self help style prescriptions, for fun ! Instead, here’s 10 psychological steps to help you make ET Contact.
- Let go of all preconceptions about how ETs are supposed to be.
- Let go of all ideas about the nature of your own self.
- Drop all fear and Nike it (just do it).
- Drop all expectations.
- Keep and open mind and an open heart.
- Want it for the right reasons.
- Know what the right reasons are.
- Let go of all your addictions for at least 1 day – including all electronics, cameras, smoking etc.
- Be prepared to face the unknown in you and in them.
In today’s walk and talk I explore the self through the Buddhist concept of the 5 Aggregates and Process Fields (my own idea, which is simlar to Alfred White Northhead’s Process Philosophy) and ask how we are to live when we can embrace a wider concept of self.
During the early part of this walk, I examine two dead sheep – who provide a real life example of the nature of the self. Don’t look if images of death frighten you. These things are a part of my day to day reality and reguarly remind me of the nature of the self.
More on the 5 Aggregates here : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skandha and Process Philosophy here : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_philosophy / https://archive.org/details/AlfredNorthWhiteheadProcessAndReality.
May your contemplations be grand and illuminating ! 😉
Here’s the very provocative and insightful Matthew Williams interviewing the Italian crop circle artist and author Francesco Grassi (http://www.francescograssi.com/) . If you really want to understand crop circles, drop your preconceptions about the mystery of crop circles and read Francesco’s book : https://www.amazon.com.au/d/CROP-CIRCLES-Signs-Intelligence-Encounters-ebook/B01NBN25CD/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&qid=1497314838&sr=8-9&keywords=Francesco+Grassi.
Francesco demonstrates very clearly and logically how modern crop circles have their roots with the famous Doug and Dave, who were inspired by the Tully saucer nest and how most of the tell tale signs of so called authenticity are flawed. He also demonstrates very clearly and precisely, how to make the most complex crop circles, in a way that befuddles even the so called experts !
From Francesco, “Crop circles are a giant circular stage on which many artists have been taking turns for decades at different times. Each one performs his number; some stay, others fade away. Some bring innovations, others recycle obsolete acts. There’s always room for everyone on this stage, and there’s always a new audience ready to applaud. Some stay, others fade, but the circular substructure is always there, firmly anchored with solid roots.”
If you’re interested in the people who are drawn to crop circles, you might also like to read Jim Schnabel’s Round in Circles (http://www.jimschnabel.com/ / https://www.amazon.com/Round-Circles-Poltergeists-Pranksters-Cropwatchers/dp/0879759348).
In previous monologues I’ve suggested that real spiritual development has nothing to do developing super powers or transcending the body and everything to do cultivating awareness of mind and body and living fully within the body. In today’s walk and talk, I explore some of the same ground I explored in TSM 108 – suggesting how we might move through our senses deep into the body and integrate all that arises into our awareness and in so doing, deepen the well of experience.
For those who are interested in learning ET contact, might I suggest you begin by learning how to deepen the well of experience. Begin with the body and the body will grow !
Enjoy ! 😉
What is life ?
In today’s monologue I explore the idea of the body of our life’s work and the bodies of work within our life. I explore how our life is the sum of all our life’s work and is reflected in the final moments of who we are in our life (or at any moment) and how at any moment we are working on a body of work, whether we are conscious of it or not. I speculate that we can consciously choose the bodies of work that fill our life – whether they are visible or invisible and suggest that a life well lived, is one in which we come to understand and develop some awareness of the nature of the bodies of work that we allow to fill our life.
My iPod gave a lot of trouble during this recording and I had to stitch together separate segments after it unexpectedly shut down. Forgive any repetition !
Enjoy ! 😉