Hey folks, how are y’all ? I’ve been a little out of sorts since having my 7th tumour treatment injection earlier in the week. Lots of hypoglycemia (glucose down as low as 2 some days !), severe stomach cramps, twitches, palpitations and diarrhoea. But I am otherwise well ! Things are usually worse around injection time but as the drug dissolves through the month, the side effects lighten up a little ! Here’s the needle that gets jabbed in my arse every month (below) ! Apparenty it’s worth $2,500 a shot ! Thank God most of it is subsidised ! Tell me that isn’t Big Pharma pulling a conjob ! I now have 7, 3 cm nodules from my jabs, that don’t seem to be going away ! One more year to see if it makes any real difference to my tumours ! Till then, you can call me Mr Lumpy Bum !
I’ve been working feverishly on trying to complete the Dude book. I’ve just about completed my 400 page poetry book – 1 poem to rewrite and then I can put all my energy into the Dude book ! You might recall that I decided to add some conversations to the original interview. I have had so many with Dude, that I didn’t know where to start. So for now I’ve narrowed it down to a small group of conversations. I may add more later. The problem with the conversations is that I have to transcribe them from my recordings and then type them up. So it takes a long time. I have 1 more question to complete the interview and then it’s complete. I’ve also added a section on Dude’s Maxims, Dude’s discovery of a strange world where perception influences reality in a very strange way, Dude’s leaf collection and lessons on the nature of the self . You can see the draft contents page here : https://app.box.com/s/3115vd67hxkuwvavdoepzmu53m5af288. This will probably be re-arranged a little but it’s mostly how the book will look.
You can read the section on How ETs Interact Through Internal Spaces here : https://app.box.com/s/x1b5vil0i6cjynkqkmnhp80vy3ce1sx7 and see a basic diagram that goes with this section here : https://app.box.com/s/u91y12qf4clb7xx4tr95r5irfqpizweq. There maybe some errors in dates and so on. I have to check a bunch of stuff against my journals. I’ve also found some typos I haven’t had the chance to fix. This is just a draft, so please don’t post it anywhere else. It may change a little but this is the raw first draft.
For each of the conversations, I’ve included a small section on the context of each conversation. The context of this particular conversation may come across a little ‘me-ish’, a little ‘self centered’ and that was not my intention. But I don’t think the conversation would make much sense unless I explained the history of how I came to be interested in this subject and working with internal spaces and internal contact.
The conversations are literally the conversations I had with Dude. They follow a simple conversational style, much like a Platonic/Socratic Dialogue style in simple form (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plato#Dialogues / https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socratic_dialogue). When ever I talk with Dude I often ask things I think I understand, just so that I am completely sure of what Dude is saying. Conversely Dude often checks in to make sure I understand him.
If you read the final book, you may notice that some of the things that Dude says in later conversations are slightly different to what he has said in earlier conversations. And that’s because he constantly adjusts his language and ideas to where I’m at. We also tend to mirror each others language, as happens with many people in conversations. You’ll remember from the interview that Dude modifies his language to every person he speaks with. There are times when I’ve seen him speak very formally and politely to other people and then he acts like a complete scallywag when he speaks with me ! That’s just how he is. He’s a master of adaptation ! Which is one of the reasons he’s considered a great diplomat among his people and why he has the role he has working with humans on Earth !
When I started with this idea of interviewing Dude, I never envisioned a book. But then I quickly I realised it’s significance. It was only after I had finished 3/4 of the interview, that it occurred to me that some of the conversations that we’d had might make a useful addition. For a while I thought maybe I should put them in a separate book but I then realised that they actually complement many of the things that were raised in the interview.
I think the book will be about 200 pages in size 11 font. I’ll be using a similar format when I write-up the Anamika (Teal’hia) book.
This particular extract will go well with the things I’ve said about internal world contact and conjoined space. If you haven’t read or heard any of this information, this conversation may not make much sense.
I’m curious to see what you make of it !
I’ve yet to decide on how to publish the book. Whether I go solo or try to find a publisher. I’ll cross that bridge when I come to it. But if you know of any good publishing houses that cover this subject, feel free to let me know. I’m going to be very fastidious about who I publish it with, if I go down that path. No one that’s published anything on abduction or archons – that kind of crap !
PS. I have been wondering if I should change Dude’s public name. I have reasons I don’t want to use his real name that I can’t reveal (in too much detail). I’ve stuck with Dude because it was the first thing to pop into my head and because it’s convenient. It seems that perhaps some people think that the whole thing is a deliberate joke. Which of course it’s not ! I don’t know if anyone will take a book about an ET called Dude seriously. So what are your thoughts ? Dude or someone else ? In the novel I’m writing Dude assumes the name of Frank. As many of you know, I also use the name Anamika for my Teal’hia friend, as a cover name for her real name. But in writing about all the other ETs, I have and will in future, be using their real names. I have a soft spot for these two people and want to keep a little privacy for myself !
This is just a brief post before going to bed. I often post things late at night and sometimes they’re pretty rough and badly written. I’m tired and in no mood to write something well articulated tonight ! So consider this an introduction to a much deeper subject !
I’ve talked a number of times previously about co-creating an Internal World for ET contact https://etandi.wordpress.com/category/internal-worlds-method/. I have a sense that not many people really understand what it’s all about and even fewer people believe that it’s possible. So let me clarify the subject a little.
When you know your true nature, you know that you are at your core the luminosity that is within. Some human cultures have identified this. In Tibetan Buddhism it’s referred to as the Ground Luminosity, in the Near Death experience it’s referred to as the Light, in Neo Advaita, it’s sometimes referred to as the Self. The space faring ETs have all come to understand this in their own way. In addition they have a well-rounded understanding of how mind works and how mind creates reality. As a result of this, they also understand how imagination can shape reality. Their understanding of both the nature of the Self and the Mind and Imagination, allows them to interact with others in non physical ways.
Now, you might ask, why would they do that ? I’ll give you one simple reason…Space is big ! And because space is big, it is not always convenient to travel to a place to meet with a person. So sometimes it is more useful to meet a person in an internal world – a world that is created by the imagination.
This method has been used by different ETs for aeons but not all ETs (both planet bound and space faring) are comfortable with this method. But the vast majority of the space faring ETs are. I’ve been told that at various times in human history, this method has been used by a small number of people to maintain contact with ETs. The majority of them were taught this by the ETs themselves.
In a future post I’ll explain more about how this method works with the ETs and that will explain more of why the ETs come across more than extraterrestrial and why the term extraterrestrial may actually be a misnomer !
So for now I just want to leave you with an appreciation of the possibilities that such methods open up for ET contact. Consider for a moment, this possibility. You ask an ET or a group of ETs to work with you to create a world in your imagination. You enter that world and discover a whole planet that looks nothing like anything you know. Soon after entering the world you meet the ETs who helped fulfil your request. From here on, what’s possible is like a choose your own adventure book. You might :
- Meet with the ETs, introduce yourself and get to know them.
- Be taught how to navigate through this new world.
- Be given the life story of any of the beings.
- Learn about any of their planets, cultures, societies, people or families.
- Ask 101 questions and have some of them answered.
- Be given lessons on any number of subjects.
- Take a journey with any of the ETs around the planet &/or be simultaneously given lessons on any number of subjects.
- Be taken from here to an actual physical world.
- Be taken on board a physical craft.
- Make a new friend/new friends.
- Be given healing.
- Receive help with a particular you are experiencing or have experienced repeatedly across lifetimes.
- Be given large volumes of information with or without instruction on any subject.
- Be shown the inner workings of particular forces/systems in the natural world.
- Be taught about the life force and.or consciousness.
- Be taught about the experiences or perspectives of other life forms (one’s that are familiar to you and ones that are not !).
- Be taken to another internal world.
- Be given the chance to invite others into your internal world (be they human or otherwise).
- Be taken to another internal world where you might have the chance to meet large numbers of other ETs (think of this possibility like meeting a gathering of new people you don’t know at a conference, an airport or a dinner !).
- Be taken into your own past or future.
- be taken to see other lives (what we would think of as past or future lives or what Dude would call a conjoined space/conjoined life related to your current life).
- Be taken to experience The Creator.
There’s no limit to what’s possible. It is after all about developing relationships.
At some point you will naturally want proof for yourself that what you are experiencing in the boundaries of your imagination, is actually real and more than just imagination. And if you are fortunate and patient, such an opportunity will be given to you (as it was to me last year).
The most important things to remember about this method, is that you require a still mind, complete awareness, a strong desire for contact, gratitude and to know why you want contact and what’s behind your intentions. Sure you can turn up and have no reason for wanting the experience but it will work best when you have clear reasons for wanting the experience. You can also (as I have done), have reasons for wanting contact but go in and let things unfold very organically, with no idea about where it’s going or what might be offered to you next !
Imagine that you have the ability to shape a lucid dream and to invite a friend to help shape the dream. But within the dream what takes place has a reality all of its own. And that reality can spill into your waking reality. That’s a little like what this process looks like.
The key to the whole thing is to remember that all separation between inner and outer worlds, is merely an illusion. There is only one. But when you enter an internal world with an ET in this way, the boundaries that you perceive between inner and outer, can break down very quickly ! So quickly that you maybe completely unprepared for what happens next !
People spend so much time and effort trying to establish contact with little green men out there ! Ignorant that little green men can equally be found within !
Don’t be afraid to try, just because it goes against everything you’ve been taught to believe !
When I made a decision in 2000 to first start sharing my ET contact experiences, I did so reluctantly, with little sense of just how much hostile criticism I’d receive. At the time, I was going through an incredibly hard time after the birth of my son the year before. He was born with congenital heart disease and we were paranoid that we would lose him. I had also gone back to study social work and on my off days I was working at a piggery (where I reluctantly injected 5,000 pigs a day with growth hormonen – a job I hated !), just to keep my car on the road. Life was fucking hard and I was struggling to cope ! To top it off I was having otherworldly experiences that left me feeling very alone. There was no one apart from Rachel, who I could turn to to make sense of things. So I turned to the internet. But in the end all I found was hostility and judgement and so I turned my back on sharing until I started my last blog Otherworldly Encounters in 2009.
From 1991 – when I had my first conscious encounter, onwards, I had but one other person in my life to help make sense of what was happening when I/we experienced these encounters. I found little if any help on the internet ! The only real help of any value that I found, was the work of Dr John Mack – which highlighted that other experiencers were having similar struggles integrating their experiences. Later, conversations with Preston Dennett confirmed my suspicions about the types of people that ETs were in contact with. Overall I found that most of the material about ET contact on the internet, was a repetition of the same old garbage and cultural memes and it just didn’t resonate with what I was experiencing. Even to this day, that is still the case. It was only by talking to people like Preston, that it became clear to me that much of what passes as contact on the internet, isn’t what people are experiencing in actuality.
When I began sharing, I turned to the internet looking for help but after turning my back on the internet for 8 years, I returned, not to seek help but to share a different perspective on the phenomenon. I was still active on the internet from 2001-2008, I just didn’t share anything. Instead I did what I did in the early 90’s with the ARRNet (when monochrome green was hot and waiting a day for a reply was fast) – I read as much as I could online and tried to figure out just what it was that people believed they were experiencing. Over the course of that time, I came to see my own experiences completely differently to most people and to see the wider phenomenon in a completely different light. One which included an all pervasive psychological perspective that remained largely hidden from popular discourse. I also came to see that the general perceptions of ET contact were shaped by what I came to think of as Americanism (Whiteyitis or Californicated Thinking) – something to this day I detest and which most people appear to remain completely unaware of.
I thought sharing would be easier because the subject had been out in the public domain for almost another decade and I thought people were more open. But sharing wasn’t any easier ! In the first few months that I began sharing I received regular hate mail and nasty messages. I also received a couple of death threats (one of which came from a supposed serial killer who I challenged online, independent of the ET subject). When I posted my first videos, the hate mail and nasty messages intensified and it became very personal. One person, Robbert van den Broeke (a fraud if ever there was ! – http://www.robbertvandenbroeke.com/) even went so far as to wish that I would die of cancer, at a time when my tumours had returned with a vengeance and I was very sick (he claimed of course that someone had hijacked his email !). I had been a member of several forums and eventually I left Project Avalon Forum because the hostility was making me sicker. I was a fool to have ever joined that group but I did meet some very good people there !
In 2012 a small time Hollywood actor sent me a small HD video camera and encouraged me to make a How to Make Contact video series. Something I had already considered but wanted to do when I was ready and up to it. I mean my tumours had returned the year before and I still felt pretty shit ! As kind as this person’s gesture was, I wasn’t willing to be controlled by someone else. This person planned on scripting the project and I suspect editing the series and when I said ‘No, I’m not ready !’, he became very aggressive and nasty and demanded I send the camera back. I did so and he claimed he never received the camera back. I didn’t pay for tracking because I didn’t care to pay, I just wanted the camera and the controlling ego out of my life ! Fortunately that was the end of it and I haven’t heard from him since !
A few years ago a well known person in this field wrote to me under a pseudonym and offered to help my son and I financially and to visit, at a time when I was very sick and had my first fundraiser. Rachel and Dude had warned me what he was about to do, so I promptly ignored his emails. I appreciated the offer but I didn’t appreciate him pretending to be someone else. I felt like he wanted to know what I know. Now unlike a lot of people, I don’t hate this person. There are a lot of things he has said and done I don’t like but I also acknowledge that he has done a lot of good and created a lot of healthy dialogue about this subject. I would just have preferred that he was transparent. And I know he isn’t the only person or agency to have written to me under a pseudonym.
Since those first videos many people have attacked me for mumbling. Little do they know I’ve been critiqued for that since I was at university. Sometimes I do talk quietly and here’s why. In the late 80’s and early 90’s I listened to a lot of heavy metal and noise at high volume and I did some significant damage to my ear drums – so much so that today I can’t hear certain frequencies. When I speak, things seem louder than they actually are. I’ve done a lot of group work and public speaking and I actually have a very loud voice when I choose to project it (I always thought I’d like to have a go at one of those heavy metal growling world records). But out here, I live a very quiet life with my son and the trees and the birds. I have no reason to speak loud. So when I make a recording I often forget to speak louder because it sounds loud enough to my ears. It’s just one of those petty little things that pisses me off and prevents me from wanting to share more. These days I have a thicker skin but it’s still annoying !
In early 1994 I was a no one, invisible to everyone – except a covert group that was in contact with Dude (but I didn’t know that then). Then when I met Rachel in late 1994, I came under the scrutiny of the same group in England (via a well known tech company in Australia). They did their normal surveillance and screened my family. They discovered I had an uncle who was a former con, a paedophile and a drug addict and that my mother had OCD and had suffered post natal depression. I was deemed a weak link but of no significant threat. I never made a splash at school or university. I worked hard and remained out of sight. And yet I felt very much like the Julian Assanges of the world. But no one in 1994 knew that because I’d never done anything subversive. Then after I started my blog in 2009 I became aware of the online monitoring of all our electronic communications. Rachel had warned me about the extent of global surveillance (details of which go further than you’ve heard from Snowden so far) in late 94 but back then I was dubious about her claims. Since then, nearly everything she disclosed to me (the general outlines – she was careful not to breach her security oath) has come to light in the public domain. Dude further clarified many of the things she’d hinted at and the workings of The Architecture.
Up until 2012 I did little to protect my privacy. The only thing I did do from about 2005, is that when I wanted to research something potentially delicate, I did it in a public library (under a pseudonym if I had to) and in internet cafe’s, so that I wouldn’t leave any kind of personal trace. And it’s something I still do today to protect my privacy. I only ever research things from home, that I’m totally comfortable with others knowing. Everything else is done off site. I never talk about important things over the phone !
In 2007 I stopped using a mobile phone on a frequent basis and stopped carrying one around in 2012. Partly for health reasons and partly for privacy. I only ever use my son’s phone or an old phone, if I have to. I don’t carry one, travel with one, store anything of value or upload any information of importance on a mobile phone. I often travel a long way from home without a phone. Just like the good ole days, when we survived without them !
After I shared my first videos in 2012, I became aware of physical monitoring – when a number of individuals with connections to SAIC (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_Applications_International_Corporation) came to investigate my January 19th 2011 experience in Halls Gap, Grampians. I was told they were coming before they arrived and saw evidence of their visit. One day I actually watched them assessing the sight. The monitoring continued after 2012 (but it may have been a different group) and I realised that the more I give out, the more they’re going to keep tabs on what I claim to experience. It was obvious that they want to know what is real and what is not. I knew from Rachel’s previous work that this is what certain agencies do. They investigate and monitor significant claims of ET contact. Some turn out to be bogus and others turn out to be real. The difference between the work done by the group that investigated my contacts and Rachel’s group was that her group used gifted psychics to bilocate back to potential events to confirm if they were real and the SAIC related group simply collected residual site data. Both groups were involved in surveillance and monitoring targeted individuals.
Later when we moved back to our farm, the surveillance and monitoring continued and as a result I set up a series of trail cameras around the property to collect evidence of subversive activity. I know they watch our home from time to time and have photos of our home and probably have satellite imagery but I don’t really care. Dude or one of the other ETs will always tell me when they’re coming.
I’ve come to accept that surveillance and monitoring are apart of life. What these groups don’t seem to realise is that it’s helped me to build a profile on them and to learn who they are – both electronically and psychically !
I’ve come to detest the surveillance and monitoring but I know that these people are only doing their job. It’s their controllers I hate. And I mean hate. I don’t back away from feeling that emotion. No love and light here ! I know the kinds of activities these people orchestrate and I utterly loath what they represent !
The thing I really dislike however are the crazies. The nutcases who pose a real threat to my life and the lives of people I care about. These people are often religious fundamentalists but not always. The fact that I suggest that space faring ETs are benevolent in nature and want to teach people how to make contact, seems to attract the worst kinds of human beings. The one’s who relish division and separation and who seem to see me as some kind of devil who needs to be eliminated. I’ve had run ins with a few of these kinds of people (even worked with a few) and I feel that the world is better off without them ! They pose a threat to anyone who comes in contact with them. And I have no time for them. That’s why I will never disclose where I live (at the time) and why begrudgingly, I must remain totally quiet about my experiences in my local community.
Before my sister died, I had told her a number of things about my ET contact experiences and I even asked Dude to visit her on her death bed – which he did. Two of my other sisters know a little about what I have experienced and my mother knows a little. But as yet I have been unable to approach the issue with my father. And that is incredibly difficult to sit with because it means that my father will never really know who I am. My experiences are such an integral part of my experience of life and it really hurts me that I have to partition myself around my father. My father maybe open to the subject. I don’t know. I know he saw UFOs on radar when he was flying in the RAAF and he has at times expressed an openness to the subject (while at other times expressed ridicule of the subject). But it is for example, a big leap from UFOs on radar to Dude and Anamika or to disclosing that the ETs showed me his daughters looming death years before it happened ! I’ve come close to opening up a few times but have been cautioned that now is not the time and in hindsight I think it would have been a mistake. But I would like to imagine that I can share some of my experiences with my father before one of us dies !
After 2012 when I began sharing my experiences on video, I decided I would try and tell the story of several of my encounters in full. But I quickly realised that it took more effort than I realised and it was exhausting. Add the dumb comments and the hostility and it just didn’t seem worth it. Which is why I have’t done much since. When my tumours returned in 2011, I thought I should share what I could – just in case I didn’t make it. Then as my health grew worse I realised that I was making things worse by sharing, so I pulled back. Now it’s all about harmony. I have to harmonise between giving and receiving. I can’t afford to share unless it’s worth it. I don’t have the energy to share when it makes me sicker. Staying alive is my number one priority. My son is my number two priority. Sharing my ET contact experiences, just doesn’t rate on a list of my priorities. So I share when I can. When I’m up to it and when I feel it’s worth it. I can’t share when it compromises my health or my life ! It isn’t that important ! But I’ve made lots of mistakes and been a fool for making myself so sick ! I have no one to blame but myself !
At different times, so many people have tried to gain something from me for nothing. What do I mean by that ? I mean they want something that I have, in return for nothing. For a long time I did that. I answered every email, every message, every comment and I responded to every attack- no matter how much it drained me or made me feel sick. I was a complete dickhead ! So these days I have to ask myself, ‘What’s in it for me ?’. Now that might seem awfully selfish but my life depends on it ! I have to figure out if every single interaction is worth it ! I have to determine what impact giving my energy away will have, what impact the things I share will have, what impact interacting with every person will have ! Which is why I no longer allow comments on my experience videos and I don’t allow every comment on the blog. And it’s also why from time to time I ignore people or I tell them to fuck off ! You wouldn’t believe the things people ask of me or how needy or dependent some people are ! And the worst people of all, are people with money ! I know there are a lot of good people with money who are regulars and I’m not talking about you. I’m taking about the people who write to me begging for help, who never offer anything in return – not even a thanks ! I just want to send those people an arsehole bomb !
I’ve said before that my time sharing my ET contact experiences is time limited. I can’t wait to disappear, to grow more trees and to publish my novels ! I like helping people and I really appreciate when other people understand what I’m trying to convey and learn to think about things for themselves. But sadly, that isn’t the majority. The majority want to be spoon fed and want something for nothing and want to take, take, take and never think for themselves. So all the work I do in relation to this subject, is for the very small minority who get it and who are open minded and open hearted enough to look beyond what’s popular. But it’s also for those who are yet unborn and for generations in the future who will look back and try to understand the small numbers of people who were in contact with ETs, who understood what it’s all about.
If I had my time again, I would remain invisible and keep everything out of the pubic domain. And that’s what I’d recommend to others in a similar position – stay invisible, cherish this as your own personal experience and share your experience only with people you trust in real life. Because at the end of the day, I’m not sure that it’s worth it overall. It isn’t worth the drama and the suffering ! But it is worth it in a host of small ways. The friendships and acquaintances are worth it ! Knowing that others are catching on to what I’m sharing makes it worth it ! Knowing that I’m helping a small number of people to understand themselves and the true nature of the self makes it worth it ! Knowing that I offer an antidote to the mass ignorance and stupidity makes it worth it ! Knowing that I can educate a small number of people about who the ETs are and what they’re like, is worth it !
I am however just one small man with a very small voice, that has something to say that is drowned out by the voice of the masses and the squeaky wheels. The only way that anything I do has any impact, is if others take what I have learned (or at least some of it) and apply it to their own lives and initiate their own ET contact and have their own relationships with beings from elsewhere. Then and only then, will anything I have ever had to say on the subject of ET contact, have any real and lasting value, to the betterment of humanity. Otherwise all this, is no more than dust in the wind.
Opening up about ET contact, is really a form of disclosure that forces bigotry to reveal itself. But it’s also about acknowledging our interconnectedness with all things. I for one have little patience for bigotry and all the time in the world for authentic connection !
I recently read Robbie Graham’s excellent book UFOs’ : Reframing the Debate https://www.amazon.com/UFOs-Reframing-Debate-Robbie-Graham/dp/1786770237 and felt the need to explore the theme of how we perceive contact with the “other”, while out walking. When I listened to this monologue I realised it was so full of wind, that I’d have to can it (which is something I’ve done to about 20 monologues). But given it’s a long one (1:45:50) I decided to keep it. So please be warned, it’s full of wind in places and there was nothing I could do to prevent it or edit it out.
In this walk I take up the issue of how humans perceive and make sense of contact with the other. We could call the other ET but it’s not always clear at the time or after, that that’s exactly what it is. I ask how conditioning, belief, perception and self awareness determine how we make sense of an experience. I also suggest that these things change across the human life cycle (brain freeze – I couldn’t articulate this clearly at the time : http://winstonwuttunee.blogspot.com.au/p/blog-page_2171.html) and suggest that every human being having an experience sits at a certain point in the developmental cycle and as a result interprets the experience in a certain way
The point I try to emphasise is that how we perceive and the level of self awareness that we have, both determine how we see the world and how we interpret our experiences.
I suggest that contact with the other is leading us to a greater understanding of the self and reality. This understanding is helping us to grow in a way that helps us to engage more fully with the intelligence of the other.
Hang in there !
I’ve been observing the world since I was a little boy. I’ve always paid attention to the things that other people didn’t seem to notice or care about and that same trait has stayed with me into adulthood.
I notice certain trends now (as I have for the last 30 years), about where we’re heading as species, that I don’t like but am largely powerless doing anything about. I do however, have some power, to influence human perception and understanding of the ET subject, in some small way, that sends ripples throughout the human perception of time.
I was always impressed by the Iroquois proverb about thinking about the impact of what we do on the next 7 generations – the people, the plants, the animals and the Earth (which supposedly came from The Great Law of Peace of the Longhouse People – upon which the United Nations and US Constitutions were apparently framed http://www.ohio.edu/people/hartleyg/docs/Great%20Law%20of%20Peace.pdf). What I like about this reasoning is that it forces you to consider that everything is connected. Throughout my life I’ve tried very hard to live with a principle like this in mind. But if I’m honest, I can barely see the impact of how I live on one generation, let alone seven generations.
A few years ago, one particular ET race asked me to consider how the books I will write about my own ET contact and how to make ET contact, will impact on other humans for the next 10, 50 and 500 years. It was a monumental task but I sat down for several days and thought it through. How one thing connects to another. And I realised, that even if one other person fully understands what I have to share, the impact will be significant. What I hadn’t anticipated were the negative impacts. And by generating an awareness of them, I have been able to choose more carefully how to engage with the world. Remember when Dude told me not to post the 1 minute video on how to make contact ? That was an example that would have had profound negative impacts for me, in ways you can’t comprehend.
Everything in life has a positive and negative aspect and everything we do in life, can manifest both positive and negative aspects. So it’s important to choose carefully what we say and what we do. I have some novel ideas about bio-terrorism (remember my initial training was as a biologist) that could cripple any country but just because I can think of it, doesn’t mean that I should talk about it or share my ideas with another living soul. I’m even reluctant to discuss such ideas in fiction. My son and I have joked about one idea and he truly gets it but he also readily acknowledges that it’s a very dangerous idea. So we all make choices and what’s important is that we make healthy choices that consider a wider perspective that goes beyond our own life and our own time. We are after all constantly laying the foundations for the future and for the lives of all those as yet unborn. The history of humanity as a space faring race, is being shaped now by every idea, every conflict and every struggle for a better world. And the future of all life on this planet, is being influenced right now by our willingness to feel connected to Earth and to make choices that respect the needs of other life forms that share our world.
As I’ve said before, I can’t write about the ET subject every day because quite frankly it bores the hell out of me and because I’m interested in everything, in all of life and not just one tiny little aspect ! If you’re here for that reason now, you should fuck off and find a blog about UFOs or abductees because this isn’t the place for you ! But the rest of you will understand that this blog has always been about ET and I – about other life forms from elsewhere, my relationships with them and about my experience of the human condition. And quite frankly, you can’t have one without the other. I can’t explain to you anything about my relationships with ETs without telling you something about who I am and how I function. And that’s the reality of all relationships. We are defined by each other – we are in relationship to one another, no matter how you label it.
I’m often frustrated when I read about UFOs and ETs and experiencers (more often than not – aliens and abductees) because there’s so much crap ! So much stuff that just isn’t true and so much supposedly about the other and so little about the self. Who are these people having experiences and how does who they are influence their experience and why the fuck is that missing out of the narrative ? I don’t agree with how Mike Clelland sees the ET phenomenon but I really admire the honesty and candour with which he portrays himself – Here is my human experience and here is how I’m dealing with this other experience. Take it or leave it ! That’s what I like about Mike (http://www.mikeclelland.com/ / http://hiddenexperience.blogspot.com.au/) ! So few people in this entire field have such an openness to reflecting on the human experience. The don’tknowness of what I’m experiencing.
There are a lot of people with a lot of opinions about ET contact and the nature of ETs and it’s always been the case that the squeaky wheel gets the most attention (the same is true in all aspects of human life). And because people like me are largely very quiet, compared to others who profess ET contact, it’s much harder and takes a great deal more effort to reach a wider audience. But as I’ve said before, I’m not interested in popularity. Which is why you won’t find me at a UFO/Contactee conference or any other such wankathon ! I am however interested in creating a positive influence and to do so I must have faith that A. The things I am doing are worth doing (and sometimes I’ve had serious doubts about that) and B. That what I am trying to convey will be noticed in the fullness of time. And that’s what really compels me to come back and blog and to slog away at the books I’m writing (when I’d rather be writing a novel or a play !). Because it isn’t all about me ! It’s about all of us and it’s about us and them as one. I trust that some core truth that I share will be noticed by someone, somewhere in the future, if not now. And who knows how that person will influence others and how someone in turn may help in the development of human-ET relationships ? If I convey things well, things will be understood well and if I convey them poorly, they will be understood poorly. So I know that I have to think very carefully about what I say, which is why I can say somethings when I feel like saying them and other things must wait. I’ve made many mistakes regarding things I’ve said (for all manner of reasons) and I need to try to make fewer mistakes, so that things I say are truly understood.
There is a great deal of information about the ET subject that is downright wrong. I think we can safely say it’s wrong for the following reasons :
- It’s poorly informed
- It’s accidental or engineered disinformation or misinformation
- It’s based on cultural or psychic artefacts
- Its created by people with poor self-awareness
- It’s popular because of somebodyness
- It’s shaped by cultural memes
- Any or all of the above.
What bothers me most is that so many things become fact, without any prior examination or understanding. And I guess part of the real difficulty is that you can’t analyse the ET subject the way you can say an ant colony or a supermarket or a murder scene. It’s so otherworldly and confronting to human consciousness, that all we can do is look at the artefacts that it creates. And the most common artefacts are in the domain of human experience. And human experience is of course a subjective experience as much as it is an objective experience. Therein lay a deep conundrum for this entire subject, that will never be resolved.
What I foresee and what troubles me and compels me to speak out, is that what is taken to be fact today and what commands the most attention today, tomorrow is unquestionable and lays the foundation for all that follows. I don’t want to be part of history that is building itself on hollow ground !
I don’t have any real answers about how we can go forward, except to say that you should judge any information about an ET or an ET contact experience, by way of examination of the person conveying the experience. How do they come across ? Do they have any self-awareness or understanding about how their own mental state and ways of perceiving may have influenced the experience or their memories of the experience ? What do they have to gain by what they share and is it reasonable ? Are they being honest about who they are and what ET contact means to them ? Are they driven by fear, unaware ego or a need to be noticed ? What is their modus operandi in sharing the information ? What impact has what they have shared had on them and on others ? Who are the people around this person ? What have tehey sacrificed to open themselves up to the world so publically ?
You can examine a person in any number of ways and I suggest that if someone shares something about this subject that you really want to believe, you examine the person as thoroughly as possible. Just as you ought to when it comes to adapting a spiritual belief (examine everything first !). You can’t always know the truth by simply believing it but you can feel the truth if you truly know how to feel ! There have been many times someone has pointed me to some supposed abductee/experiencer, I’ve listened to them for a minute or looked at their picture and I can feel their lies. You can all learn to do the same thing, if you don’t already. There are honest people in this field but it takes discernment to sense them.
There are very few ideas about ETs that I believe are right and I’m trying to provide an antidote to that, in one of three ways. First, by suggesting to everyone that the only true way to know ET is to know yourself. Know thyself and know life. Second, by sharing my experiences of ET contact with 30 plus races. I’m trying to convey the diversity of that life to open people’s minds and hearts to difference and sameness. And third, by sharing my intimate relationships with several ETs – beings such as Anamika and Dude and at a later time, the group I call The Beloved Carers. Such that people come to know these extraterrestrials, as living beings with their own unique personalities. I’m not going to sensationalize my contact with any ET as something that makes me special or above any one else but I am going to speak out vehemently from time to time about the complete and utter bullshit that passes for truth ! And it will be up to you to decide if what I have to say is worth listening to.
Having lived now for over a decade with tumours since my diagnosis, has pushed me way past giving a shit about what anyone thinks of me and encouraged me to consider very carefully any kind of legacy I wish to leave behind. I certainly do wish to leave a legacy behind, most of which no one else will know about because it’s the stuff that I hold dearest and the stuff I keep to myself. But the subject of ETs and ET contact is something in which I feel a need to leave some kind of legacy that others do know about. And why is that ? I don’t believe it’s for egotistic reasons. I believe it’s because I give a damn and because of the burning need I have for justice and understanding. I’m happy to be the 1 person in a million who says Reptilians and Hybrid Children are bullshit, even if people hate me because of it. I can’t support what I know is false because I know where falsity leads. It leads to ignorance and greater suffering. And that’s why I am consciously trying to transmit certain messages, that go against what the majority of people interested in this field believe. Not because I like disagreeing but because I know otherwise !
So, here are the key things I wish to convey through all my work on this subject (this list may grow in time) :
- The self is boundless and limited only to our perceptions and desires.
- The soul exist in form and formlessness and is not a static entity. It is continually changing.
- All of reality is conjoined space.
- We exist in 5 types of conjoined space – waking life (think parallel lives), dream life, deep sleep, altered states and life after death. Some conjoined spaces are more subtle than others.
- There exist all manner of Creator Races – who seed, create and nurture universes, life, souls and matter. The most developed Creator Races understand the true nature of reality and the self and create entire realities.
- All space faring ETs are benevolent in nature and abide by shared agreements. Hostile (immature) races are planet bound (or solar system bound).
- Early space faring races are monitored and controlled such that they can do no harm unto other non terrestrial species.
- Any space faring ET race that needs help, can ask for it and will recieve the help that they require from any one of the collectives. (No race will, for example, face extinction because of their genetic material running dry or be bereft of materials to support themselves).
- Space faring ETs have no agendas. That is our projection onto them. They are merely doing what they do. The idea of an agenda is a dangerous projection that distorts the truth and will damage human-ET relationships.
- There is no great battle between good and evil. The greater good is always served because that is the natural direction of growth.
- There is no grand agenda for the ET presence on this Earth at this time. They are merely continuing work that they have done for a very long time.
- Space faring ETs have aeons of experience in first contact, nurturing different life forms and the difficulties that face emerging species and the difficulties that arise in relationships between different species. We should trust in their experience and patience.It is in all of our vested interests to do so. (This flies against the comort of most human beings and refelects our insecurity and unwillingness to let go and drop expectations of how things should be).
- Approximately 5,500 years ago the ETs established a kind of structure on Earth to guide in the development of modern humans. This structure which I call The Architecture, was created with inbuilt secrecy to protect humans from themselves and was bastardised by humans seeking control. It was known that this would happen, right from the beginning and allowed to happen, as this is the only way to guide humanity towards the best possible distant future, in which we would survive and become a space faring race. The upper arms of The Architecture are ET and the lower arms of The Architecture are human. The ETs control the flow of information, in which ever way they wish. The current structure of TA is headed by 9 ETs from different races – 3 of which are Creator Races. An Earth born human from a previous human civilisation who is part of this group, has the final say on the welfare of Earth and all key issues related to her welfare. He is the current representative that leads a much larger collective. The ET I refer to as Dude (of the Muajra people) is in the position of what we would think of as second in charge. He resides on Earth 6 days a week attending to a broad range of issues related to now and Earth in the future.
- Some ETs can know anything anywhere at any time and materialise as anything anywhere that they wish. Nothing can be hidden from them. Nothing !
- Anyone can have ET contact. The key ingredients are : self-awareness, pure intention free from self-deception and greed, a deep understanding of why you want contact, a willingness to surrender control and drop all expectation, patience and openness.
- You can have contact with ETs externally in the outer world or internally in the inner world. There is no separation between inner and outer worlds, only the illusion that it is so. Both forms of contact require that you have self-awareness.
- The key to understanding ETs and ET contact is not consciousness, it’s the life force. Understand the life force and you will never feel separated from ETs for a moment.
- Humans can never alter the past. Even though many in the future will believe that they can. (Later I’ll write about the coming Chrononaut Movement and the Religious Chrononauts who believe they can change religious development and re-engineer the human future).
Over the years many people have thrown the research of David Jacobs at me to ponder because they feel that I’m wrong about the ETs and that they are abducting us to fulfill some seedy agenda. I stand by my argument that the notion of abduction represents the perception of one’s experiences at the lower end of the developmental spectrum (https://etandi.wordpress.com/2014/12/21/how-the-perception-of-et-contact-changes-humans/) and not what is actually happening.
I’ve read several of David’s books and listened to many of his interviews. He has done a lot of good work, although I can say little about how he does his regression work or the people that he has worked with.
As far as I can tell he is one of those researchers who sees the small picture – how ETs appear to be to the person who feels powerless. His belief that ETs are infiltrating the planet, is at best naive and myopic and at worst just downright stupid and dangerous. Because David doesn’t seem to have had any contact experiences himself (and no history of contact experiences), he lacks the insight to truly understand the nature of these experiences. While he is right about a great deal of ET contact being clandestine (or subversive), he is completely wrong in his conclusions about what this means and why the ETs function the way that they do.
To play into his conclusions (and the conclusions of others like him), logically leads us to conclude that we live in a dystopian universe where living beings are caught in a battle between the forces of evil and good. Which, based on my own experiences with ETs, is a faulty and unhealthy way of thinking.
I suggest that those who are interested in the subject of ET contact (by whatever name you call it), examine cautiously the claims of people who believe that ETs have a dark agenda and are a threat to us. To take such claims at face value, is to play into ignorance and to lose sight of the larger picture of how different ET races interact with one another and how sentient life has evolved.
The things in this monologue were probably the hardest things I’ve ever spoken about publicly.
Today, I open up and share my thoughts about memory, uncertainty and doubt in the ET contact experience, looking at two of my own experiences 23 years apart. I explore how contact with beings from elsewhere shatters your experience of reality and talk about why I think most people who have contact, avoid talking about uncertainty and doubt and why these things are really critical to making sense of the experience. I post this monologue with some hesitation but do so because I belive that we need to be as honest and transparent as we can be, if we are to truly understand the experience of human-ET contact.
There is some repetitive noise in the early part of the recording due to my shoes squeaking and the squeaking on my iPod cover.
Enjoy ! 😉
According to the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, Disclosure is a word first used in 1567, which is defined as :
“the act of making something known / the act of disclosing something / something (such as information) that is made known or revealed / something that is disclosed.”
In legal terms, Disclosure can be defined as :
“An act or instance of disclosing: as a : a lender’s revelation of information to a consumer under the Truth in Lending Act that enables the consumer to make an intelligent decision about the loan b : the revelation to investors of financial information about a corporation or municipality and about the security it is offering for sale — see also prospectus, registration statement. Editor’s note: Disclosure is required for a public offering. c : revelation by a corporate insider (as an officer) for approval of a business transaction that involves self-dealing d : a debtor in bankruptcy’s revelation to creditors of a bankruptcy plan.”
Relevant synonyms include revelation, divulgence and exposure. Related words include bombshell, kick, kicker, surprise, acknowledgment, admission, avowal, concession and confession. Near antonyms include concealment and cover up.
I don’t know who really came up with the idea of Alien Disclosure but I think it would be fair to credit Steven Greer with kick starting the Alien Disclosure Movement and doing most of the ground work. Love him or hate him, he has almost single-handedly created a movement ! Since Steven launched the Disclosure Project (http://disclosureproject.org/), John Greenwald Jr. setup chased up FOI documents and distributed them through The Black Vault (http://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/), Richard Dolan has put forward his own thoughts on disclosure (https://www.richarddolanpress.com/), Steven Bassett has launched Paradigm Research Group (http://www.paradigmresearchgroup.org/), there has been a Citizen Hearing on Disclosure (http://www.citizenhearing.org/), Grant Cameron has prodded away at the veil around US presidents (http://www.presidentialufo.com/), Steven Greer also created new projects in the form of CSETI (http://www.cseti.org/) and Sirius/Unacknowledged (http://www.siriusdisclosure.com/), Rey Hernandez set up an experiencer based research group FREE (which I think has changed its name) (http://www.experiencer.org/) and recently a new group has arisen with the amusing name of The Disclosure Activists (http://www.disclosureactivists.org/ / https://www.change.org/p/united-nations-world-governments-media-formally-acknowledge-that-extraterrestrial-intelligences-are-engaging-the-human-race).
The idea of setting up a group to force governments of the world to drop their secrecy around UFOs and ETs isn’t new. In 1977 Peter Gersten set up a group called Citizens Against UFO Secrecy (CAUS) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_Against_UFO_Secrecy / http://www.v-j-enterprises.com/caus.html). The group took aim at governments and corporations concealing the truth, in the same year as Close Encounters of the Third Kind hit cinema screens and brought government concealment of the ET presence to the foreground of people’s awareness. Back then most people just didn’t get it. But since then, a lot of things have changed, including our ability to communicate and find information ! What was remarkable about Peter and his group was his willingness to push Freedom of Information and take a legal stance on opening up secrecy.
According to VJ Enterprises, the website which references Peter Gersten :
“For those of you not familiar with Peter, he is a criminal defense attorney who in 1977 brought suit in a U.S. District Court on behalf of Ground Saucer Watch against the Central Intelligence Agency. Pursuant to the FOIA lawsuit, the CIA in 1979 released over 900 pages of documents relating to the UFO phenomenon. They refused to release 57 documents, claiming national security considerations. On June 24th, 1980 Gersten brought suit against the National Security Agency on behalf of his own recently formed organization, Citizens Against UFO Secrecy, for 135 UFO related documents. On November 18, 1980, based upon a NSA top secret affidavit, the Court dismissed the lawsuit stating that “the continued need for secrecy far out weighed the public’s right to know.”
The two key principles identified by Peters group were :
“1) It is against any and all secrecy relating to contact with all forms of extraterrestrial intelligence
2) it believes that the public has the absolute and unconditional right to know about this contact.”
In addition Peter said of his group :
“Pursuant to these principles, CAUS is involved to specific projects to get the truth out:
1) A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit to be filed against the Army based upon the book “Day After Roswell” attributed to Lt. Col. (ret) Philip Corso.
2) “Project:Destination Moon,’ the first civilian, privately financed, rocket to the moon to send back live photos from Sinus Medii to verify alleged artificial structures located there
3) the CAUS INITIATIVE, a viable and practical alternative to Congressional hearings, immunity and amnesty
4) ‘Beyond a Reasonable Doubt,’ a promotional and fundraising video on behalf of CAUS.”
Does any of this sound familiar ? A lot of what has become the modern ET Disclosure movement, was probably mapped out by Peter and the CAUS group.
So what do people mean these days when they speak of Alien/ET Disclosure ? I think most people mean that governments and their leaders will come out and talk openly about their history of contact with beings from other worlds.
I think that there are several core issues in relation to disclosure that are largely ignored. First, we have a lot of expectation about what we ought to be told. What are our expectations and why do we have the right to have them fulfilled ? Second, we assume that our governments know everything about the ETs. Do they really ? Third, we assume that governments were the first conduits for ET contact. Why would they be ? Fourth, we assume that governments were the first official conduits for ET contact, in preference to individuals within governments, corporations or other organizations. Did you ever wonder why Abe Lincoln was the person of choice for official contact before he died ? Fifth, we assume that we can handle the truth. What a load of crap ! We can’t even handle our own waste ! Sixth, we assume that people will get over the truth and that citizens will find a way to adapt to the reality of ETs visiting our planet. That maybe a comfortable assumption for those who want to know, who think they are ready for the truth but is it the reality for most of the human population ? I don’t think so ! Seventh, we assume that it is government’s or others in power who have created the secrecy. As I’ve said before (https://thesomethingmonologues.podbean.com/e/tsm120-a-rough-sketch-of-the-architecture-the-diamond-complex-power-structures-that-rule-the-world/), there are two kinds of secrecy. The secrecy created by the ETs at the top of The Architecture and it is designed to protect us from ourselves. And the secrecy created by the lower arms of The Architecture and it is mostly designed to protect self interests and to protect individuals and groups from public retribution. Eighth, we assume that the disclosures that governments have to make about their interactions with ETs are the greatest of all secrets that they have to hide. This last point is worth emphasizing. So let me make something very clear. Something that I have learned from the ETs themselves. Those in power who hold this information in secret, have much more than a history of ET contact to conceal. They have done things to populations of individual countries, that would make citizens of all walks of life, turn against them. Some of this relates to humans who witnessed ETs and ET craft and some of it relates to genocidal plans that were put into action more than a century ago. If you unravel the ET secret, you unravel all their secrets and this is something no individual or group in power is willing to do.
What most people don’t realise is, that in regard to covert groups within the lower arms of The Architecture, the ET secret goes back to at least Abe Lincoln (It maybe worth exploring other possibilities about why he was killed ?). These groups have kept this secret for a very long time and over the course of that time have developed new ways to conceal the truth and to share the truth. All of it bound by law and powerful legal documents. And obviously what began as a concealment of a greater reality that threatened to undermine their sovereign power and the power of the Church, has transformed into a concealment of a greater reality that threatens to undermine a diverse range of information and technologies, which create profit, wealth and power. Secrecy is always about power. Power in the now. But sometimes it’s also about the perception of power in the future. That’s why military and corporate entities create Strategic Plans, so that they can lay a foundation from here to there, with some degree of certainty. It’s also why some groups have used gifted psychics to profile the future and help them map out a set of desired outcomes and their desired destinations.
I think some sort of ET Disclosure has been in action since at least 1947. But it’s been soft and malleable and adjusted according to how people respond. Obviously the longer the secrecy associated with the lower arms of TA has been in action, the greater the crimes against Earth/humanity and the harder it has become for complete disclosure. What we also have to remember is the longer these groups have been able to commit atrocities against humanity, the less willing they will be to disclose everything that they have done – especially those things that fall outside of the ET subject. So, it might be plausible for them to execute some sort of very diluted plan for ET Disclosure but it can only go so far because with very little effort the links to human atrocities will reveal themselves.
I think that there are four general possibilities regarding ET Disclosure (as most people understand it) :
- It happens when the 9 ETs at the top of TA say it can happen.
- It happens with a plan, as determined by the 16/90 humans in the middle layers of TA or by the lower levels of TA.
- It happens in a very organic way without a plan.
- It is forced to happen by a series of whistleblower revelations of Biblical proportions.
My money is on three possibilities. It is already happening according to a well documented future that the ETs have explored thoroughly and they are following their own plan, regardless of any other human plans. It is happening with a human plan and organically – where the plan continues to be modified, depending on how humanity responds and how particular geopolitical dynamics unfold. It will be accelerated by a series of uncontainable revelations (leaks) that blow all other revelations out of the water !
I think what is clear is that with or without a plan, those in power are attempting to acclimatize people to the reality of ET life and condition them to certain ideas about what it might be like and to influence them to believe certain things which are true and which are false. I suspect that different individuals and groups within the lower arms, have different, perhaps competing agendas, that sometimes pull collective thinking one way and sometimes pull it another.
The question I keep asking myself, is why do people really want disclosure, when they can discover the reality of ETs and ET contact for themselves ? I think the answer might be – because like the Parental Fallacy (see James Hillman) that occurs in most people (who see childhood experience with parents as the key to healthy human development), we think an authority figure has all the answers and will show us the way. Forgetting first and foremost, that we ought to trust ourselves. But we don’t as individuals or as a species and that’s why we always look for answers outside of ourselves.
I’d like to propose a set of categories of ET Disclosure, that I believe more accurately match how things are or could be, rather than what we assume they should be.
1. Full Disclosure Type A (FDTA) : In which members of the lower arms of The Architecture use official government bodies to disclose the nature of their ET contact, ET related work and all other secrets. (I don’t think this will ever happen.)
2. Full Disclosure Type B (FDTB) : In which members of the lower arms of The Architecture use official government bodies to disclose the full nature of their ET contact. (I think this could happen in 200-300 years. I had previously suggested in 100 years. I think I was wrong.)
3. Partial Disclosure Type A (PDTA) : In which members of the lower arms of The Architecture use official government bodies to disclose a very diluted version of the nature of their ET contact, ET related work and other secrets. (I think this could happen in 100 years.)
4. Partial Disclosure Type B (PDTB) : In which members of the lower arms of The Architecture use official government bodies to disclose a very diluted version of the nature of their ET contact and ET related work. (I think this could happen in 25-50 years.)
5. Partial Disclosure Type C (PDTC) : In which members of the lower arms of The Architecture use official government bodies to disclose a very diluted version of the nature of their ET contact. (I think this could happen in 10-20 years.)
6. Nestled Disclosure Type A (NDTA) : In which members of the lower arms of The Architecture use a wide range of outlets and fronts to release small amounts of information about the nature of their ET contact, ET related work and other secrets, nestled within public information that is both easy and hard to find. Such information is slowly and incrementally increased to a point that reaches full disclosure. (I don’t think this will ever happen.)
7. Nestled Disclosure Type B (NDTB) : In which members of the lower arms of The Architecture use a wide range of outlets and fronts to release small amounts of information about the nature of their ET contact, ET related work and other secrets, nestled within public information that is both easy and hard to find. Such information is slowly and incrementally increased to a point that reaches partial disclosure (PDTA). (I think this could happen in 100 years.)
8. Nestled Disclosure Type C (NDTC) : In which members of the lower arms of The Architecture use a wide range of outlets and fronts to release small amounts of information about the nature of their ET contact and ET related work, nestled within public information that is both easy and hard to find. Such information is slowly and incrementally increased to a point that reaches full disclosure (FDTB). (I think this could happen in 200-300 years.)
9. Nestled Disclosure Type D (NDTD) : In which members of the lower arms of The Architecture use a wide range of outlets and fronts to release small amounts of information about the nature of their ET contact and ET related work, nestled within public information that is both easy and hard to find. Such information is slowly and incrementally increased to a point that reaches partial disclosure (PDTB). (I think this could happen in 100 years.)
10. Nestled Disclosure Type E (NDTE) : In which members of the lower arms of The Architecture use a wide range of outlets and fronts to release small amounts of information about the nature of their ET contact, nestled within public information that is both easy and hard to find. Such information is slowly and incrementally increased to a point that reaches full disclosure (FDTB). (I think this could happen in 200-300 years.)
11. Nestled Disclosure Type F (NDTF): In which members of the lower arms of The Architecture use a wide range of outlets and fronts to release small amounts of information about the nature of their ET contact, nestled within public information that is both easy and hard to find. Such information is slowly and incrementally increased to a point that reaches partial disclosure (PDTC). (I think this could happen in 100 years.)
12. Trojan Disclosure Type A (TDTA) : In which members of the lower arms of The Architecture use a wide range of outlets and fronts to release small amounts of information about the nature of their ET contact and ET related work, within a range of ongoing true and false disclosures that have been within public information that is both easy and hard to find. This information is blended with previously released false information, such that over time, more of the available information becomes true. Such information is slowly and incrementally increased to a point that reaches full disclosure (FDTB). (I think this could happen in 100 years.)
13. Trojan Disclosure Type B (TDTB) : In which members of the lower arms of The Architecture use a wide range of outlets and fronts to release small amounts of information about the nature of their ET contact and ET related work, within a range of ongoing true and false disclosures that have been within public information that is both easy and hard to find. This information is blended with previously released false information, such that over time, more of the available information becomes true. Such information is slowly and incrementally increased to a point that reaches partial disclosure. (I think this could happen in 25 years.)
14. Trojan Disclosure Type C (TDTC) : In which members of the lower arms of The Architecture use a wide range of outlets and fronts to release small amounts of information about the nature of their ET contact, within a range of ongoing true and false disclosures that have been within public information that is both easy and hard to find. This information is blended with previously released false information, such that over time, more of the available information becomes true. Such information is slowly and incrementally increased to a point that reaches full disclosure. (I think this could happen in 100 years.)
15. Trojan Disclosure Type D (TDTD) : In which members of the lower arms of The Architecture use a wide range of outlets and fronts to release small amounts of information about the nature of their ET contact, within a range of ongoing true and false disclosures that have been within public information that is both easy and hard to find. This information is blended with previously released false information, such that over time, more of the available information becomes true. Such information is slowly and incrementally increased to a point that reaches partial disclosure (PDTB). (I think this has been happening for the last three decades and will continue.)
16. False Disclosure Type A (FDTA) : In which members of the lower arms of The Architecture use individuals, official government bodies and non government bodies to disclose a false version of the nature of their ET contact and ET related work. (I think this has been happening for the last three decades and will continue.)
17. False Disclosure Type B (FDTB) : In which members of the lower arms of The Architecture use individuals, official government bodies and non government bodies to disclose a false version of the nature of their ET contact. (I think this has been happening for the last six decades and will continue.)
18. Revelationary Disclosure (RA): In which a former insider with one of the highest levels of clearance, within the lower arms of The Architecture, produces evidence that blows the lid off the true nature of ET contact, a great deal of ET related work and many other secrets. Such a revelationary disclosure, will, like in the Book of Revelations, lead to a catastrophic show down between different groups within the lower arms of The Architecture and guilty parties that are identified and the public – who will call for significant retribution, justice and restitution. (I think such an event is highly probable in the next 30 years because good people always find a way.)
19. Standard Whistleblower Disclosure Type A (SWDTA) : In which a former insider with a any level of clearance, within the lower arms of The Architecture, makes disclosures about the nature of ET contact and ET related work. Such disclosures will likely be related to single project but may provide links to other projects. Those who disclose in this way will seek protection via constitutional law and/or some kind of public profile. (I think such disclosures have been happening for the last two decades and will continue.)
20. Standard Whistleblower Disclosure Type B (SWDTB) : In which a former insider with any level of clearance, within the lower arms of The Architecture, makes disclosures about the nature of ET contact. Such disclosures will likely be related to single project but may provide links to other projects. Those who disclose in this way will seek protection via constitutional law and/or some kind of public profile. (I think such disclosures have been happening for the last two decades and will continue.)
21. Dead Man’s Disclosure Type A (DMDTA) : In which a former insider with a high level of clearance, within the lower arms of The Architecture, makes significant disclosures about the nature of ET contact and ET related work. Such disclosures will likely be related to single project but may provide links to other projects. Those who disclose in this way will seek protection via a web of connections and triggers that will be activated should they go down. (I think such disclosures have been happening for the last two decades and will continue.)
22. Dead Man’s Disclosure Type B (DMDTB) : In which a former insider with a high level of clearance, within the lower arms of The Architecture, makes significant disclosures about the nature of ET contact. Such disclosures will likely be related to single project but may provide links to other projects. Those who disclose in this way will seek protection via a web of connections and triggers that will be activated should they go down. (I think such disclosures have been happening for the last two decades and will continue.)
23. Kamikaze Disclosure Type A (KDTA) : In which a former insider with a high level of clearance, within the lower arms of The Architecture, makes significant disclosures about the nature of ET contact and ET related work. Such disclosures will likely be related to single project but may provide links to other projects. These disclosures will include names of projects, participant organizations and individual project members. Those who disclose in this way will not seek out any protection, believing that disclosure is worth any risk to their personal safety. (I think this will begin within the next decade.)
24. Kamikaze Disclosure Type B (KDTB) : In which a former insider with a high level of clearance, within the lower arms of The Architecture, makes significant disclosures about the nature of ET contact and ET related work. Such disclosures will likely be related to single project but may provide links to other projects. These disclosures will not include names of projects, participant organizations and individual project members. Those who disclose in this way will not seek out any protection, believing that disclosure is worth any risk to their personal safety. (I think this will begin within the next decade.)
25. Experiencer Disclosure Type A (EDTA) : In which genuine ET contact experiencers reveal the nature of their ET contact experiences and what they have learned from the ETs. (I think this has been happening for the last six decades and will continue.)
26. Experiencer Disclosure Type B (EDTB) : In which genuine ET contact experiencers reveal the nature of their ET contact experiences and what they have learned from the ETs. (I think this has been happening for the last six decades and will continue.)
This is by no means an exhaustive list of possibilities regarding how we could categorize ET disclosure. All of these possibilities can happen out of the public eye or with single individuals or groups of individuals directly in the public eye. Whistleblowers who come forward may choose to go it alone or come forward as a kind of group disclosure, as occurred with Steven Greer’s Disclosure Project, when witnesses testified before the media. They may also do so through a genuine congressional hearing or hearing before any other elected political body. And while many people think there’s safety in numbers, people who breach their security oaths (binding legal documents that are usually good for 100 years) will still face significant risks to their personal/family safety.
So, ET Disclosure is a big idea that probably means lots of things to lots of people. There are lots of different ways that we can look at the subject and lots of different ways that we can categorise disclosure. The point I’m trying to make in this post, is that ET Disclosure is a nebulous concept and that while most people think they are ready for the truth, they really aren’t. The reason that Full ET Disclosure (as I have defined it in FDTA) is a delusion, is that it means the lower arms of The Architecture will have to come clean about ET contact, ET related work and every other secret that has been kept from the masses. Think of secret information as a giant web (or ball of string). When you tug on one side or several sides of the web hard enough, all the other parts of the web begin to give way. This means that not only will the lower arms of TA be entirely be exposed and forced to collapse but The Diamond Complex (sorry I haven’t elaborated on this yet) will be exposed, laying bare everything about how the modern world is constructed and bring about a major collapse of the modern world as we know it. This would be unlikely to be beneficial in the short-term but ultimately beneficial in the long run. Unless you know what I am talking about, you probably won’t understand my comment. What I would urge you to do is to look at how our history has been constructed and look very, very carefully at the history of the British Empire, India, America and Europe, in particular. Look at how the great Industrial Empires of 18th and 19th century were created and what has become of them today. If you can do that, you will understand why I say that full disclosure will bring about a major collapse of the modern world.
This thing that people call disclosure is really a misnomer because people are confused about what they want disclosed and what could be disclosed, that is connected to what they want disclosed. What people are really seeking is a true account of the history of modern man and empire in the modern age. I would suggest that a better word to describe what it is that people really seek is “Revelation” but unfortunately that word has too many biblical connotations to be used accurately. The problem with whatever word we choose, is that it will either confine or inflate what it is that people truly seek. And whatever word people choose, will mean different things to different people. For now, it seems that we’re stuck with Disclosure. And I think in a couple of centuries when people (including historians) look back at this time, they will refer to The Disclosure Movement. Which is a way will be kind of tragic because the name itself won’t really say enough about what it was all about. But that’s how history often works – poor choices, poor language and poor names to describe things get stuck and get carried. Think of The Crusades, The Declaration of Independence, The Reformation, The Renaissance, 9/11, Age of Man, Middle Ages, Modernism, Modernity, The Plague etc.
Full Disclosure is a delusion that many people are reluctant to let go of because it promises so much. In some kind of mythical way, it promises to liberate people from their suffering and offers them some kind of transcendence because most people have no idea what it really means and are too lazy to do the work of spiritual development for themselves. It’s not that disclosure itself actually promises anything. Its people who load it with all kinds of unrealistic expectations. In addition to Full Disclosure being a delusion (internal deception arising in the individual mind), I think we can also say that disclosure is an illusion (external deception arising outside of the individual). So in a sense disclosure is both a misperception created by us and by others. And that’s a very dangerous thing because if we aren’t aware of our own minds or how influence and propaganda work, we can easily be misled into thinking we’ve witnessed significant revelation, when we’ve merely decieved ourselves and/or been spoon fed another lie or half truth. And as we all know, the masses can easily be manipulated for any cause.
What I would like to see is a systematic analysis of what passes as disclosure and an exploration of what disclosure has been, is and could be; what it means to people; and what the implications of the many types of disclosure could have on the human world as we know it now and in the future.
Until such a time prevails, I believe the idea of disclosure will bounce around between those who seek genuine liberation of the facts and the nutcases of the world who spend more time masturbating and ejaculating on other people’s ideas, than examining their own. If you think I’m being vile and poking fun at a lot of people, I am and for good reason. Because I’m sick and tired of the worlds idiots getting all the attention and hijacking fruitful conversations about how we as human beings wish to live and ought to live. We’ve allready had enough crazy people hijack our species !
You can read more on the subject of disclosure here :
When I posted my retelling of my January 19th, 2011 encounter with the Teal’hia and the Sar’Won’Dee, I mentioned being shown a series of global events that will happen in our collective future. At the time I didn’t fully understand the context of what I was shown and I was never actually told, “this will happen on this date”. I was merely shown trigger events to watch for. I watched global events very carefully from that point onwards and at a certain point I thought events were falling into place and what I was shown was just around the corner. The whole thing made me very uncomfortable and so I reluctantly posted the following video.
A few months later I took the video down because I realised that I was wrong and I felt like an idiot scaring people needlessly and putting my neck on the line for nothing. I was also ravaged by malicious people who seemed to take delight in criticising me. Several encounters later I gained more insight into what I was shown and have had my ass kicked gently by Dude, who encourage me to lighten up. I’m not as yet prepared to discuss what I learned and how what I learned changed how I understand events and what I was shown but what I can say is the following. It seems that in one paralell life (reality) (or part of conjoined pace) these events may yet have happened (as has my distant viewing of the election of Hillary Clinton, followed by a black female president). But in this paralell life (part of conjoined space) they have not yet happened.
I’m posting the video now, only for a limited time, so that you can take note of what I was shown, just in case things continue to unfold in the direction I was shown. I’m only concerned now because of the way that things are currently heating up in the middle east and between the US-North Korea.
Now, at the time I remembered what I was shown, I spoke to my ex Rachel (who you will recall was involved in profiling the human future using poly-location (think bi-location) for a covert group in the UK) and Rachel felt that I was wrong. We’ve talked about it many times and I have come to the conclusion that either I remembered wrongly (which seems unlikely to me but not impossible given the intensity of the experience I had with them) or that she visited a different set of timelines, in which these events did not occur. Rachel had told me on numerous occasions that in her own work she often went back to the same time period and encountered different sets of events and different histories. Which seems to indicate to me that she was visiting subtly different paralell lives/timelines/conjoined spaces.
So, despite cautions from two people I greatly respect, I can’t let this go. Whenever I have spoken to the Teal’hia they have confirmed that these events are still in our collective future. But just what that means, I’m not sure. Perhaps I’ll discuss what else was explained to me at a later date but I’m not comfortable with that now. Maybe my fixation with this reflects more of my own apocryphal disposition, as I’ve suggested previously here : https://etandi.wordpress.com/2014/10/28/the-boyd-bushman-interview/ (ignore the improper address on this post), than a realistic unfolding of our current time line. But I’m going to take a risk and leave the video up for a little while because I am concerned.
Listen to it at your own peril ! In the mean time, I suggest you put whatever I have to say behind you and go back to enjoying life ! I may well be wrong !
I’m going to bed in the next hour, so this will be a very brief post.
I’ve been thinking about the so called Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (which incidentally I think ought to be called Search for Human Intelligence – do we have any ?) and I wondered why we seem to have limited it to the micro waves, radio waves, x-rays and gamma rays. Why aren’t we putting more effort into scanning for ultraviolet waves or the visible light spectrum for random and regular bursts of energy, brief or sustained bursts of energy ? If plants use visible light (and other forms of energy) and we need visible light to survive, why wouldn’t some ETs consider communicating in the least exotic form of electromagnetic energy ? The one that is most universal and fundamental to life (as we know it). We may also find that the use of visible light as a transmission mechanism, may have allready been encoded (think about how DNA works) in pigments that are widely distrbuted in plants (and flowers), algae and fungi.
In addition to this I wonder why we aren’t scanning for sound waves in various frequencies and amplitudes, as discrete short sounds or more complex sounds like pulses and melodies. Think about killer whales, dolphins and whales and how they communicate across cast distances and bats and moths and dolphins that use echolocation to build pictures and maps of the world around them.
And of course any search for intelligence elsewhere in the cosmos is limited by our own perception of the nature of reality and our own sense of what exists. Perhaps there are waves at either end of the electromagnetic spectrum that we have not yet discovered or developed technology for, that harbour worlds of communication and conversation.
Finally, we have in recent years become intoxicated with holographic explanations of reality (in which any volume of space can accommodate any volume of matter that we want – think Dr Who’s TARDIS – bigger on the inside and ET craft – also, often bigger on the inside). Why aren’t we looking in some way for ultra-compressed or ultra-expanded forms of energy that may contain huge amounts or small amounts of information, in discrete units of energy or structures like melodies and minimalist like repetitions. Such information might not simply provide content but actually be able to create and change reality for the recipiant or initiate the transformation of some structure or process. Perhaps such information is already encoded in our own sun and in all suns, or in space itself ? Or at the heart of black holes and white holes ?
At present SETI is primarily focussed on – on off, binary signals. Signals that show something turning on and off. I wonder what SETI would look like if scientists tried to tune into a continuous conversation between minds and hearts in the cosmos. Or if SETI scientists did what I and others like myself do and tried to send messages of their own out into the cosmos using thought, feeling and intention. When you practice SETI in this way you move beyond on off/binary communication and move into relationships. That then, is real intelligence !
More reading here :